All records, convictions, and filings from the United States and the State of South Dakota are fundamentally defective, fabricated, and legally void. The state authorities engaged in extensive misconduct, including:
Therefore, any reliance on these records to determine admissibility or equivalency under Canadian law is invalid.
The actions by the State of South Dakota violate multiple international legal instruments:
These violations underscore that the original U.S. proceedings were not conducted in accordance with recognized legal standards.
| Case | Jurisdiction | Principle |
|---|---|---|
| Singh v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 177 | Canada | Foreign convictions obtained in violation of fundamental justice may be excluded from admissibility determinations. |
| Charkaoui v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 | Canada | National authorities cannot rely on procedurally unfair or fabricated foreign proceedings to limit rights of residents or applicants. |
| R v. Hape, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 292 | Canada | Evidence obtained abroad under unfair or unlawful procedures may be inadmissible domestically. |
Given the fabricated evidence, procedural misconduct, and lack of lawful jurisdiction, all U.S. records, South Dakota filings, and alleged convictions against Dean Snow are void ab initio. Canadian authorities must disregard these records in any admissibility or equivalency analysis.
The "Cash for Kids" scandal and associated corruption reveal systemic failures. No legitimate, lawful evidence exists supporting the alleged offences.
On the basis of jurisdictional defects, fabricated evidence, and multiple violations of international law and recognized legal principles:
This tactical submission therefore rejects all claims of inadmissibility under IRPA section 36(1)(b) as grounded on false and corrupt foreign proceedings.
Prepared and submitted on 2025-08-27.