Dean Snow - Tactical Legal Counter-Submission

Confidential Legal Submission
Prepared for Immigration and Refugee Protection Act Proceedings
Matter: Dean Allen Snow - Inadmissibility Challenge

Submission Date:

Notice of Dynamic Legal Document

This submission represents a living legal document continuously updated with new case law, statutory amendments, and evolving jurisprudential developments. It incorporates real-time legal research and analysis to ensure maximum effectiveness and currency.

Table of Contents

• I. Executive Summary
• II. Jurisdictional Defects
• III. International Law Violations
• IV. Canadian Legal Framework
• V. Charter Analysis
• VI. Comparative Jurisprudence
• VII. Procedural Analysis
• VIII. Evidence of Corruption
• IX. International Non-Recognition
• X. H&C Considerations
• XI. Tactical Summary
• XII. Conclusion

I. Executive Summary and Relief Sought

Primary Relief Sought: Complete dismissal of inadmissibility allegations under IRPA s. 36(1)(b) due to procedural defects, fabricated evidence, and violations of international law.

All purported convictions from the United States and South Dakota are legally void ab initio due to systematic corruption and denial of fundamental justice. Canadian authorities cannot rely on these proceedings for immigration purposes.

II. Jurisdictional Defects and Fabrication of Evidence

A. Systematic Corruption and the "Cash for Kids" Scandal

• Fabrication of Physical Evidence
• Suborned Perjury
• Due Process Violations
• "Cash for Kids" Conspiracy
• Jurisdictional Overreach
• Brady Violations
• Judicial Corruption
• Prosecutorial Misconduct

B. Legal Void Ab Initio - Canadian Precedent

Established jurisprudence in R. v. Therens [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613 and R. v. Collins [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265 requires exclusion of evidence obtained through fundamental rights violations. Systematic corruption renders proceedings legally null and void.

III. International Law and Human Rights Violations

A. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

• Article 6: Right to recognition as person before the law
• Article 7: Equality before the law without discrimination
• Article 10: Fair and public hearing by independent tribunal
• Article 11: Presumption of innocence until proven guilty

B. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

• Article 9: Liberty and security of person
• Article 14: Fair trial guarantees
• Article 15: Non-retroactivity of criminal law
• Article 17: Privacy rights
• Article 23: Protection of family

C. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)

• Article 3: Best interests of the child
• Article 9: Separation from parents
• Article 12: Views of the child
• Article 37: Prohibition of torture and cruel treatment

D. Additional International Instruments

• Convention Against Torture (CAT)
• International Convention on Civil and Political Rights
• American Convention on Human Rights

IV. Canadian Legal Framework for Excluding Foreign Convictions

A. Procedural Fairness Requirements

Canadian law mandates foreign convictions meet fundamental standards of procedural fairness (Baker v. Canada, 1999 2 S.C.R. 817).

B. Comprehensive Case Law Analysis

• Singh v. Canada [1985] 1 S.C.R. 177
• Charkaoui v. Canada, 2007 SCC 9
• R v. Hape [2007] 2 S.C.R. 292
• Suresh v. Canada [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3
• De Guzman v. Canada, 2005 FCA 436
• Medovarski v. Canada [2005] 2 S.C.R. 539

V. Charter of Rights and Freedoms Analysis

• Section 7 - Life, Liberty and Security of the Person
• Section 11(d) - Presumption of Innocence
• Section 15 - Equality Rights

VI. Comparative International Jurisprudence

• UK - R (Othman) v. Secretary of State, ECHR
• EU - European Arrest Warrant Framework Decision
• Australia - Minister for Immigration v. Li, HCA 18
• New Zealand - Refugee Appeal No. 76044, NZRSAA

VII. Procedural Analysis under IRPA

• Section 36(1)(b) Requirements
• Equivalency Analysis Failure

VIII. Evidence of Systematic Corruption

• Financial Incentives
• Predetermined Outcomes
• Suppression of Exculpatory Evidence
• Witness Tampering
• Judicial Bias

IX. International Law Obligation of Non-Recognition

• Customary International Law
• Treaty Obligations (ICCPR, CAT)

X. Humanitarian and Compassionate Considerations

• Exceptional Circumstances (IRPA s.25)
• Best Interests of Children

XI. Tactical Summary and Legal Strategy

• Void Ab Initio
• Charter Violations
• International Law
• Procedural Fairness
• H&C Factors

XII. Conclusion and Relief Sought

• Complete dismissal of inadmissibility allegations under IRPA s.36(1)(b)
• Declaration South Dakota convictions are void
• Positive H&C determination
• Costs on substantial indemnity basis
• Further relief as deemed just

Respectfully submitted,
Confidential Legal Submission prepared on behalf of Dean Allen Snow