Minister's Final Submissions

ID File / Dossier de la SI: 0001-C5-00563-01-AH
UCI/ICU: 1147006224 — SNOW, Dean Allen

Allegation

The allegation consists of three elements. Elements 1 and 2 were established at the proceeding on July 30, 2025. Element 3 (equivalency to a Canadian offence) is addressed below.

1. Status in Canada — Foreign National

Conclusion: Under subsection 2(1) of IRPA, Mr. SNOW is a foreign national without the right to enter or remain in Canada.

2. Conviction of an Offence Outside Canada

Conclusion: Mr. SNOW was convicted of a serious offence outside Canada.

3. Identity Confirmation

4. Equivalency to a Canadian Offence

Legal Framework

Per IntHill v. Canada, equivalency may be established by:

  1. Comparing the elements of the foreign and Canadian statutes.
  2. Examining the evidence presented in foreign proceedings.
  3. Combining (1) and (2).

Foreign offence: South Dakota Code § 22-19-1(5) — Kidnapping, first degree (Aug 20–21, 2010).
Canadian reference: Criminal Code §§ 281–282 — Abduction/child custody violations (2010, 2025).
Both versions of the Criminal Code are functionally identical.

Comparison Table: Core Elements

Jurisdiction Offence Age Actions Custody Violation Intent Maximum Penalty
SD Code §22-19-1(5) Kidnapping, 1st degree <14 Unlawful removal, enticement, concealment, detention Yes To deprive lawful custodian Class C felony: life + $50,000 fine
CC §§281–282 Abduction under custody order <14 Unlawful removal, enticement, concealment, detention Yes To deprive lawful guardian Indictable offence: up to 10 years

Key Point: Both statutes criminalize unlawful taking/keeping of a child under 14 against custody orders. U.S. penalties are harsher; Canadian law caps at 10 years.

5. Evidence of Actions in the Foreign Offence

Row Focus Evidence
2 Parentage/Victim Identification Mr. SNOW admitted kidnapping his daughter (8 y.o.) and step-son (9 y.o.). Lost full custody of daughter; listed as respondent father. Convicted Feb 16, 2011.
7 Contravention of Custody Order Court placed child with SD Dept. of Social Services for adoption; no parental consent needed. Confirms violation of custody order.
8 Intent to Deprive Custodian Mr. SNOW and ex-spouse took children from in-laws, intending to travel to Canada and California. Children deprived of lawful possession for 5 days.

Conclusion: The evidence confirms the South Dakota offence aligns with Canadian offence elements — unlawful removal, violation of custody order, and intent to deprive guardian of custody.

6. Admissibility Conclusion

Source References