Tactical Legal Counter-Submission

Date Submitted:

Overview

This document serves as a tactical counter-submission addressing the fabricated evidence, defective jurisdiction, and procedural irregularities in the case involving the State of South Dakota. It incorporates references to international law, case law, and principles of human rights and due process.

Core Arguments

1. Jurisdictional Defects

The United States and State of South Dakota records are fatally flawed and void due to fabrication and misrepresentation of facts. The state acted outside its lawful authority, rendering all subsequent actions defective.

2. Fabricated Evidence

The prosecution relied upon evidence that was knowingly falsified. This undermines the integrity of the judicial process and violates both domestic and international legal standards.

3. Sovereign and International Law References

4. Procedural Irregularities

The accused was forced to represent himself under the guise of a "Sovereign Citizen" defense, preventing facts from being properly presented to the court. The family's right to closure was denied due to these procedural failures.

Linked Documents and Supporting Files

Next Steps

This page serves as a hub for all related tactical documents. Future linked pages will provide detailed analysis, categorized evidence, and references for investigators and legal counsel to review and pursue.